Home

 


|2016.03.30|Issue 17|研究動態-1研究動態-2活動訊息聯絡我們PDF
  

【法實證研究專題】

 
從臥躺鐵軌到對簿公堂:
從關廠工人案觀當代台灣社會運動的法律動員

作者:蘇上雅(國立台灣大學科際整合法律研究所二年級) 


    
序起:動的車站曾經屏息
 
  車站,向來是動與不動交會的境地。潛入台北車站地下月台,晦暗老舊的地鐵棧道,被往返穿梭的列車擎來千道光芒、陣陣疾風,還有一股動能、一種連續,夾帶著各種人情印象:歸來的遊子風塵僕僕地拉著行李下車,下工的歸人則拖著一身疲憊踏上列車被送往遠處另一端點的家。車站月台,是乘載著列車、人與情緒流動的所在。

       但你可曾記得某個傍晚時分,車站那流動的風景曾戛然而止?那傍晚,車站聚滿了人,有原要搭車的旅客、路過的駐足的許多群眾、台鐵站務人員,連穿著制服、佩帶著槍械的警官也來了,還有鏡頭對準著月台。一剎那間,在現場或電視機前,時空仿若靜止,我們屏氣呆望著、不解地看著這群年過半百、頭上身上手上綁著、拉著布條的大嬸和阿伯,咕咚便跳下了平時給火車輾過的軌道,就這樣肩挨著肩,臥在斑駁冰冷的鑄鐵上,守著那正駛近的龐然巨物。那一刻,火車靠近時駛得特別緩慢,慢到在眾人鼓譟驚聲的前一刻停止。

  但這一刻屏息並沒有停滯。事實上,它亦如疾駛的火車,乘載著一群勞工從青壯年累積至老叟斑白的失望、憤怒與漫長等待;糾結著受雇者、雇主與國家政府三者之間的矛盾;沿襲著十年前勞工草根運動的激烈,卻也因著那導火線,而承啟另一種運動形式的可能——以法庭作為「抗爭」場域而正義的過程。這是曾經震驚台灣社會一時的2013年2月5日的全國關廠工人臥軌事件,但它實有著更深遠的脈絡待我們去爬梳;而臥軌本身以及其後工人與行政院勞委會間的訴訟,對於探究遭惡性倒閉之關廠工人所面臨的困境,與當代社會運動中法律所扮演之角色與特性,皆深具表徵意義。以下,筆者爬梳法實證研究資料庫中所收納、2012年全國關廠工人事件豐富史料文獻——包括相關新聞報導與法院判決——輔以其他文獻史料,試圖呈現此事件複雜的歷史背景、過程與意義.......(詳見PDF檔)
 
……………more

 

【法律與社會變遷調查】


生活中的法律——
法律與社會變遷調查第四期調查成果
 

一、法律與社會變遷調查第四期簡介
 
  法律與社會變遷調查於2009年2月至3月間,展開了第一期的調查,至今已累積了數期的調查結果。
 
     第四期的法律與社會變遷調查,我們規劃了不同的調查主題,並陸續展開訪問。其中一項調查計畫是以「生活中的法律」為主題,探討常民在日常生活中的法律經驗。調查團隊將第一期的訪問問卷做了部分修正後,進行重複施測,於2014年完成調查。這份以「生活中的法律」為主題的問卷,經歷了兩次不同時間點的調查,不僅累積了調查成果,更能從兩次的調查中,看出各個問項的變遷情形。
 
  2014年「生活中的法律」調查完畢後,資料檔和報告皆已放上網頁,可在「法律與社會變遷調查資料庫」查詢資料。網址為:http://tadels.law.ntu.edu.tw/database-society/database04-3.php?page=1&no=14
 

二、調查基本資料

.調查執行單位:中原大學財經法律學系
.委託單位:世新大學民意調查研究中心
.調查執行期間:2014年10月20日至2014年11月08日
.調查方式:電話訪問
.調查範圍及對象:臺灣及澎湖(不包括連江縣與金門縣)18歲以上之一般民眾。
.實際執行結果樣本數:1500人
.受訪者平均年齡:約為42.157歲
.每通完訪電話平均訪問時間:約11.23分鐘

 ......(詳見PDF檔)

……………more

 


【活動與快訊】

 

 

●加拿大的性法律之路

講者:Professor Janine Benedet
(The University of British Columbia; Vice Dean, Allard School of Law; Co-Director, Centre for Feminist Legal Studies)
 
場次一:
Sexual Assault Law Reform as a Catalyst for Social Change: Nonconsent, coercion and Inequality
性侵法律改革作為社會變遷的觸媒:不同意、強制與不平等
主持人:陳昭如(臺灣大學法律學院教授)
時間:4/12(二)19:00-21:00
地點:臺灣大學法律學院霖澤館3樓1301視聽教室
 
場次二:
Reflections on the Legal Campaign for Prostitution Abolition in Canada
加拿大廢娼法律倡議的反思
主持人:黃長玲(臺灣大學政治學系副教授)
時間:4/14(四)19:00-21:00
地點:臺灣大學法律學院霖澤館3樓1301視聽教室
 
活動皆無須報名,可自由參加!
可抵服務二、碩博士班學習時數與公務人員學習時數
聯絡人:廖庭萱同學 r03a21004@ntu.edu.tw
主辦單位:臺灣大學法律學院人權與法理學研究中心、臺灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室、臺灣大學法律學院基礎法學研究中心
活動網頁:https://goo.gl/KiwenB 
 


 
 

 2016台灣法理學會年度學術研討會暨會員大會

「憲政法理學」
 
 
日期:2016年4月23日(六)9:30-17:00
地點:世新大學管理學院大樓2樓國際會議廳(台北市文山區木柵路一段111號)
http://www.shu.edu.tw/SHU-Traffic-M.aspx

2016年3289:00起開放報名。
 
議程表:
時間
流程
09:30-10:00
報到
10:00-12:00
第一場
主持人:王效文(國立成功大學法律學系教授)
發表人及論文:
1. 江玉林(國立政治大學特聘教授、法學院教授)
2. 黃舒芃(中央研究院法律學研究所研究員)
3. 鍾芳樺(輔仁大學法律系助理教授)
12:00-13:30
會員大會與午餐
13:30-14:30
第二場
主題演講:顏厥安(國立臺灣大學法律學系教授)
主題:憲政法理學
主持人: 張嘉尹(世新大學法學院院長、台灣法理學會理事長)
14:30-15:00
茶敘
15:00-17:00
第三場
主持人: 莊世同(國立臺灣大學法律學系副教授)
發表人及論文:
4. 林佳和(國立政治大學法律系副教授)
5. 蘇慧婕(中央研究院歐美研究所助研究員)
6. 張嘉尹(世新大學法學院院長、台灣法理學會理事長)
 
 
 
*論文發表每場120分鐘,每一發表人25分鐘、討論15分鐘。
 
 
聯絡信箱:taplstaff@gmail.com
 
 
聯絡人:江維萱小姐(02-2652-5409)
本活動網址:
http://wp.me/p45ZKF-bS
 
 
 

 THE U.S. FEMINIST JUDGMENTS PROJECT:

REWRITING THE LAW, WRITING THE FUTURE

 
Call for Papers and Presentations
Deadline April 15, 2016
 
 
We are seeking proposals for papers to be presented during the U. S. Feminist Judgments Project conference October 20-21, 2016 at the Center for Constitutional Law  at The University of Akron School of Law in Akron, Ohio. We are also seeking proposals for “snapshot” presentations to be included in the final plenary of the conference. The conference is co-sponsored by The University of Akron School of Law and the University of Nevada, Las Vegas – William S. Boyd School of Law.
 
This conference will celebrate the 2016 publication of U.S. Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Opinions of the United States Supreme Court. That volume brought together more than fifty feminist legal scholars and lawyers to rewrite, using feminist reasoning, significant Supreme Court cases from the 1800sto the present day. (For more information, see the project website here.) Illustrating the value of this method of practical scholarship, the volume demonstrates that different processes and different outcomes would have been possible had decision makers applied feminist theory and methods in critical Supreme Court cases despite the restrictions of stare decisis.
The conference is designed to provide the appropriate setting and the essential participants for a structured conversation that explores and assesses the effects of feminist methods and theories on real-world judicial decision making. We expect the conference will identify common core principles and propose directions for future scholarship.
 
To this end, we seek proposals for papers that incorporate feminist theory and methods or report on research that furthers feminist thought. The organizers view feminism and feminist theory broadly as covering issues of inequality related to gender and gender norms, but also intersectional dynamics related to race, sexual orientation, immigration status, socioeconomic class, and disability.
 
Potential topics cover a broad range, including women in the judiciary, women in the legal profession, women and rhetoric, women in politics, empirical studies involving gender or gender norms, feminist theory, reproductive freedom, pregnancy, reproduction, families, sex, sexuality, violence against women, employment, sexual harassment, or affirmative action. We welcome with enthusiasm proposals from faculty in disciplines other than law, and we would especially appreciate proposals from new voices in feminism and feminist theory.
 
Our hope is to build on the insights of the U.S. Feminist Judgments book and to explore new avenues of inquiry for feminist legal scholarship. We hope to provide a supportive atmosphere to foster scholarship and networking among teachers, scholars, and others who are interested in gender equality and the law.
 
The conference will include plenary sessions related specifically to the U.S. Feminist Judgments book as well as sessions that will be more general in focus, concurrent sessions drawn from this Call for Papers, and a closing panel also drawn from this Call for Papers. The closing panel will be a brainstorming session to consider future directions for scholarly and practical projects that relate to gender equality, the judiciary, future Feminist Judgments projects, or all of the foregoing.
 
 
Concurrent Sessions – Paper Proposals
The concurrent sessions will feature presentations on any topic related to gender equality issues, with preference given to presentations related to the topics of women in the judiciary, women in the legal profession, women and rhetoric, women in politics, empirical studies involving gender or gender norms, feminist theory, reproductive freedom, pregnancy, reproduction, families, sex, sexuality, violence against women, employment, sexual harassment, or affirmative action. We will organize the presentations into panels based on the subject matter of the proposals.
 
Interested persons should submit a brief written description of the proposed paper (no more than 1000 words) and a resume. Please let us know in the proposal which of the above categories or what other, non-listed category best fits your proposal. Please use the subject line “U.S. Feminist Judgments Project October Conference Paper Proposals” and e-mail these materials to Maria Campos (maria.campos@unlv.edu) by April 15, 2016.  We will notify selected speakers by June 1, 2016.
 
 
Brainstorming Presentations – Snapshot Proposals
The final plenary session of the conference will feature snapshots, or very brief presentations, of ideas for future projects that will advance gender equality in the law. Each selected participant will be limited to five minutes to present her or his idea or project. The presentations will be followed by audience feedback and comments. We welcome proposals for this brainstorming session on any topic related to gender equality.
 
Interested persons should submit a brief written description of the proposed presentation (no more than 300 words) and a resume. Please use the subject line “U.S. Feminist Judgments Project October Conference Snapshot Proposals” and email these materials to Maria Campos (maria.campos@unlv.edu) by April 15, 2016. We will notify selected speakers by June 1, 2016.
 
 
Eligibility
Anyone interested in issues of law and gender equality is eligible to submit a proposal, including full-time faculty members, fellows, visitors, and adjuncts who teach in undergraduate or graduate schools; judges; practitioners; government officials; and business, community, and non-profit leaders. The conference is free and open to the public.
 
There is no publication commitment associated with the conference. Presentation abstracts will be made available on the website of the Center for Constitutional Law at The University of Akron, and by mutual agreement of interested authors and journal editors, remarks may be published in a special symposium issue of ConLawNOW, the online companion journal run by the Center for Constitutional Law.
 
There is no registration fee for the conference but proposers and panelists must pay all of their own expenses associated with conference attendance. There will be a conference-negotiated rate at a local hotel. The University of Akron is located approximately 15 minutes from the Akron-Canton Airport and approximately 40 miles southeast of Cleveland Hopkins International Airport.

Please direct questions regarding this Call for Papers and Presentations to Kathy Stanchi (kstanchi@temple.edu), Linda Berger (linda.berger@unlv.edu), and Bridget Crawford (bcrawford@law.pace.edu).

 

WORKSHOP ON LEGAL TEXT, DOCUMENT, AND CORPUS ANALYTICS (LTDCA-2016) FIRST CALL FOR PARTICIPATION

University of San Diego Law School, San Diego, CA, 17 June 2016
Conference website: 
http://law-and-big-data.org/LTDCA2016.html
Sponsored by the USD Center for Computation, Mathematics, and Law 
http://www.sandiego.edu/law/centers/ccml/

Workshop Description
Recent improvements both in Human Language Technology (HLT) and in techniques for storage and rapid analysis of large data collections have created new opportunities for automated interpretation of legal text, improved access to statutory and regulatory rules, and greater insights into the structure and evolution of legal systems. These techniques hold promise for the courts, legal practitioners, scholars, and citizens alike. These advances have coincided with a rapid expansion of interest in automated processing and understanding of legal texts on the part of industry, government agencies, court personnel, and the public.

This workshop is intended to be a forum for discussion of research ideas and practical developments that involve interpretation of legal text, analysis of structured legal documents, improved publication and access to document collections, predictive analysis based on legal text mining, and visualization of legal corpora. Participation is invited on all topics relevant to these research themes, including:
• Application of “Big Data” techniques, including data mining and machine learning, to legal and financial document corpora
• Network models of statutory and case law, including visualization techniques specialized for legal networks and legal tasks
• Global, emergent, and dynamic properties of legal text collections, such as modularity, language models, complexity, and trends in legal doctrine and practice
• Techniques for improving public access to, understanding of, and compliance with statutory and regulatory rule sets
• Legal question-answering systems
• Legal document analysis, including semantic analysis, information extraction, abstraction, summarization, topic modeling, coreference resolution, and document-structure analysis
• Induction of predictive and descriptive models from legal corpora, such as probability of success of a motion or claim, expected case duration and settlement value, and expected consequences of alternative litigation decisions

The intended audience for the workshop includes researchers and practitioners from industry, academia, and government working at the intersection of HLT, artificial intelligence, social science, data and network science, and law.

The workshop will be one day in length consisting of paper presentations, invited talks, demonstrations, and a panel discussion.

Submission information
Submissions are invited for research papers (at most 10 pages long), extended abstracts (at most 5 pages long), and proposals for system demonstrations. Papers must be submitted electronically in pdf format to the conference support system, 
https://www.conftool.net/ltdca2016/ by 29 April 2016. Research papers and abstracts must be in the ACM proceedings format, http://www.acm.org/sigs/pubs/proceed/template.html.

Venue
The Workshop will be held at Warren Hall, University of San Diego Law School, San Diego, California.

Important Dates
29 April 2016: Workshop Paper Due Date
13 May 2016: Notification of Acceptance
27 May 2016: Corrected papers due
17 June 2016: Workshop Date

Program Chair
Karl Branting, The MITRE Corporation, USA, 
lbranting@mitre.org, (+1) 410-660-9094

Workshop Chair
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego Law School, 
tsichelman@sandiego.edu, (+1) 619-260-7512

 

Program Committee
Thomas Bruce, Cornell Law School, 
tom@liicornell.org
Jack G. Conrad, Thomson Reuters, Corp. R&D, 
jack.g.conrad@thomsonreuters.com
William Hamilton, University of Florida Law School, 
hamiltonw@law.ufl.edu
Matt Koehler, The MITRE Corporation, 
mkoehler@mitre.org
David Lewis, David D. Lewis Consulting LLC, 
davelewis@daviddlewis.com
Jana Sukkarieh, NOHA Z, LLC, 
jana.sukkarieh@gmail.com
Daisy Zhe Wang, University of Florida, 
daisyw@cise.ufl.edu
  

 

聯絡我們:臺灣法實證研究資料庫(tadels.ntu@gmail.com)

※建議使用 IE 6.0 及FireFox 瀏覽器瀏覽